Fewer numbers, better questions.
Free to use · No credit card required
Measuring individuals makes the data worse
The moment a completion count is attached to a person's review, the count stops describing reality. Tasks get split to inflate volume, hard work gets avoided, and the honest signal you needed — that something is stuck — disappears under the noise. TIBLR's analytics are deliberately team-shaped, and personal tasks are excluded outright.
Is work still moving?
- Tasks completed per week over time
- Current blocked and stale counts alongside the trend
- Filter to a single team
- Personal tasks excluded from every figure
The chart tells you where to look, the meeting does the rest
- Jump from a metric to the tasks behind it
- Blocked and stale work grouped for the weekly sync
- Objective progress alongside raw throughput
- Activity feed for reconstructing a specific sequence of events
The metrics that earn their place
Completion trend
Tasks finished per week over time. Useful for spotting the weeks work stopped moving, and asking why.
Blocked over time
The count of blocked work, tracked. A rising line is the earliest reliable signal that something structural is wrong.
Workload distribution
Open tasks per person. Uneven distribution is common, invisible without a chart, and usually fixable.
Stale work
Tasks with no activity inside your window. The backlog rot metric — the number you want trending down.
Team activity feed
A chronological record of what changed and who changed it, for when you need to reconstruct how something happened.
Objective progress
How completed work maps onto the outcomes it was meant to move, rather than volume alone.
